<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Class naming convention in Zend Framework makes life harder</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.beyondcoding.com/2008/07/21/class-naming-convention-in-zend-framework-makes-life-harder/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.beyondcoding.com/2008/07/21/class-naming-convention-in-zend-framework-makes-life-harder/</link>
	<description>From beta to world-beater...</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 16:54:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rob...</title>
		<link>http://www.beyondcoding.com/2008/07/21/class-naming-convention-in-zend-framework-makes-life-harder/#comment-246</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 06:58:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thislab.com/?p=43#comment-246</guid>
		<description>It's really rare to need to load a controller manually as any common functionality between controllers should be factored out in action helpers.

Regards,

Rob...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s really rare to need to load a controller manually as any common functionality between controllers should be factored out in action helpers.</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>Rob&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Abernethy</title>
		<link>http://www.beyondcoding.com/2008/07/21/class-naming-convention-in-zend-framework-makes-life-harder/#comment-244</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Abernethy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 13:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thislab.com/?p=43#comment-244</guid>
		<description>I agree that the naming conventions/requirements can be somewhat confusing, but it does seem like a good balance between representing the MVC architecture in the default directory structures and having a standard naming convention.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that the naming conventions/requirements can be somewhat confusing, but it does seem like a good balance between representing the MVC architecture in the default directory structures and having a standard naming convention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Fountain</title>
		<link>http://www.beyondcoding.com/2008/07/21/class-naming-convention-in-zend-framework-makes-life-harder/#comment-245</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Fountain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 10:49:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thislab.com/?p=43#comment-245</guid>
		<description>Zend_Loader always expects class names to match paths, this is how it knows where to find them. Helpers and Controller classes are special cases, are used internally and shouldn't ever need to be loaded by Zend_Loader, which is why they have different naming conventions.

The only situation I can think of in which this would be an issue would be if you were trying to get one of your controllers to extend some base class that wasn't yet loaded. Zend_Loader would then try and find the class based on the name. Is this what you're trying to do?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zend_Loader always expects class names to match paths, this is how it knows where to find them. Helpers and Controller classes are special cases, are used internally and shouldn&#8217;t ever need to be loaded by Zend_Loader, which is why they have different naming conventions.</p>
<p>The only situation I can think of in which this would be an issue would be if you were trying to get one of your controllers to extend some base class that wasn&#8217;t yet loaded. Zend_Loader would then try and find the class based on the name. Is this what you&#8217;re trying to do?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
